Does 8kun Help Facilitate Domestic Terrorism in the United States?
Research Poster Social & Behavioral Sciences 2025 Graduate ExhibitionPresentation by Grant Sheagley
Exhibition Number 19
Abstract
This research investigates the role of 8kun, an unregulated online platform, in facilitating domestic terrorism in the United States through a comparative case study methodology. By providing an anonymous and decentralized environment, 8kun accelerates the spread of extremist ideologies, normalizing violence and enabling radicalization. The study scrutinizes three significant incidents—the Christchurch mosque shootings (2019), the El Paso Walmart shooting (2019), and the January 6 Capitol Riot (2021)—selected for their direct connections to 8kun and substantial impact on public discourse regarding online extremism.Through comparative case studies of key incidents linked to 8kun, this research identifies common mechanisms by which the platform contributes to radicalization: ideological reinforcement, normalization of violence, operational facilitation, and the transnational spread of extremist narratives. The findings emphasize the urgent need for counterterrorism policies that address the challenges posed by such platforms, including reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, enhanced transparency and accountability measures, and fostering collaboration between technology companies and government agencies. The research also acknowledges limitations related to data accessibility, causality complexity, and generalizability, and evaluates potential risks of overly broad regulatory measures to ensure that proposed policies are both effective and respectful of fundamental rights.
Importance
Unregulated online platforms like 8kun can magnify domestic terrorism by accelerating the spread of extremist ideologies. Through an analysis of high-profile events connected to 8kun, this study reveals how anonymity and the absence of moderation enable users to share violent content, glorify attackers, and plan harmful acts. By shedding light on these processes, the research highlights critical policy gaps, especially regarding content oversight and legal accountability under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Policymakers, law enforcement, and the public can use these findings to develop targeted interventions, balance free speech with public safety, and disrupt violent radicalization pathways. Ultimately, this work contributes practical insights for mitigating online extremism in the United States.